Roger,
Opinions on this will vary, however, my responses...

1.       Yes.  Centralized storage that all hosts can see and access is a must 
for Vmotion/HA/DRS as well as backups.  Needs and budget will dictate, however, 
I would have local storage only for the host OS (ESX, etc.) and a SAN for all 
the VMs\vmdk files.

2.       Acceptance of a dedicated VM is growing.  I've personally run many, 
many (police academy joke, if your didn't get it) applications with no issues 
raided from the vendor, YMMV by vendor

3.       Load and amount of data usually dictate this.  I've seen every 
mainstream app virtualized and dedicated server, here in the datacenter.

4.       I would say load and functionality.  If you have ESX with HA/DRS, then 
I personally don't care where the VMs are just as long as they are up.  I have 
seen where shops will specify that a DC\GC has to stay on the same host as an 
Exchange server, as an example.  Forget everything you know about server 
provisioning.  In my experience, dedicated servers that were running with dual 
procs and 4GB of RAM ran wonderfully with a single core and 512MB in a VM 
environment.  This is one of the many, many (see above reference :)) beautiful 
things that virtualization brings to the table.

Feel free to ping me off-list if I can help in any way.

Shook

From: Roger Wright [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 9:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Virtualization Questions

Taking a look at the potential implementation of virtualization and have 
several questions:


1.        Does/should utilization of a SAN have a direct impact on 
virtualization  decisions?  Is it better to go with local or SAN storage?

2.       Do vendors who normally require a dedicated server accept a 
virtualized server as equivalent?

3.       What type of servers (DB, Oracle, F&P, etc.) don't make good 
candidates for virtualization?    I would think that SQL/Oracle would probably 
be least recommended.

4.       Is clustering still possible with VMs?

5.       What kind of logic determines the best combination of host/guests?  
IOW, is it recommended to put all F&P servers together on one host, or should 
it be a combination of F&P, DB, etc.?

TIA!



Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076  x388

[cid:[email protected]]
_____







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<inline: image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to