I have Citrix MPS 4.5 but 2008 Terminal Services seems to be (finally) a
viable alternative to this. However it will depend entirely on the speed to
my remote sites, and how well it fits in with my future projects (VDI)
whether I take the plunge and bin Citrix altogether.

I do have to say though that in the (limited) testing I have done so far
that 2008 TS does look quite a good product.

2009/1/7 Tom Miller <[email protected]>

>  Hi Folks,
>
> I currently have a Citrix Presentation Server (or whatever it's called this
> week) for all remote users, and some internal users.  I also use the Citrix
> Access Gateway appliance for external users, which I really like.
>
> I am going to stand up a new Terminal Server/Citrix farm in the next few
> months to specifically dedicated to a particular application.  I am
> wondering if I can just use Windows 2008 Terminal Server and forgo the
> Citrix part?  I do like Citrix but it would add over $100k to licensing
> costs, and that does not include Citrix Access Gateway licenses.  I will
> also need to provide some sort of secure remote access, if I use Terminal
> Server only, similar to the Citrix Access Gateway.
>
> I am currently on Terminal Server 2003 and I understand 2008 is much
> better.
>
> Suggestions and comments appreciated.
>
>
>
>  Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to