If you do a "ver" in Windows 7, it comes back as 6.1.7000 Whereas Vista SP1 is 6.0.6001
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: > There *is* a huge advantage in waiting. > Not paying for the OS twice... That's our plan here. We often skip alternating versions anyway. Keeping up with the Joneses costs a lot and rarely pays off. I basically see Windows 7 as a Service Pack for Vista with a end-of-life date further off in the future. It's not like we're talking about something radical here, either. It isn't like Office 2007 or Vista can do amazing new things, cutting-edge science. Windows runs programs, Word is a word processor, Excel is a spreadsheet. These are solved problems. Indeed, I think one of Microsoft's problems is that there's just not that much more to *add* to Word that's worth the cost. But stockholders expect perpetually increasing revenue, and Office is Microsoft's cash cow. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
