I wouldn't necessarily say things are "fixed" in MOSS vs WSS 3.
Enhanced definitely.  Additional functionally, yes.

 

Just idle curiosity as to what things you perceive as being 'fixed' in
MOSS vs. WSS 3?

 

Scott

 

 

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sharepoint list

 

Yes but MOSS is much better in areas I need which is why I coached my
statement the way I did.  I had 3 up and running but due to the way
somethings are done in 3 that are 'fixed" in MOSS makes 3 un-usable in
my environment but would make MOSS very usable.

 

Jon

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Michael B. Smith
<[email protected]> wrote:

MOSS is just WSS 3 on steroids. WSS does LOTS of stuff. You might be
surprised...

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:23 AM 


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sharepoint list

 

My thanks to both of you.  I thought I was correct.  I am waiting on the
version 4 for WSS to come out to see if it is worth the pain of setting
it up and testing let alone getting it adopted.  MOSS 2007 would have
been worth the pain WSS 3.0 is not, at least for me it was not.

 

Jon

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Tim Vander Kooi <[email protected]>
wrote:

Correct, it is the paid version that is tied very tightly to Office
2007. Although it is very functional without it.

TVK

 

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:15 AM 


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sharepoint list

 

Please either correct me or confirm for me but MOSS2007 is the paid
version of SharePoint correct?

 

thanks a lot,

 

Jon

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Tim Vander Kooi <[email protected]>
wrote:

I'm running MOSS 2007. Still in the process of getting the document
retention part configured and used, but as a whole we love it.

TVK

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:56 AM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Sharepoint list 

 

I haven't found any SharePoint resources that are anywhere close to the
equivalent of this list. Are there many on THIS list that use
SharePoint? We do here and are in the process of moving from SharePoint
2.0 to MOSS2K7.

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sharepoint list

 

There are 2 on Yahoo.  Not high volume.

 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sharepointdiscussions/ 

 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sharepoint/

 

Only ones I know of.

 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Oliver Marshall
<[email protected]> wrote:

Anyone know of a good Sharepoint list at all ?

Olly

--
G2 Support
Online Backups

Email:  [email protected]
Web:    http://www.g2support.com <http://www.g2support.com/> 





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to