I dont recall ASB's page saying the reasoning behind the 1.5x recommendation, but I'll take another look.
-- ME2 On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Bryan Garmon <[email protected]> wrote: > http://KB.UltraTech-llc.com/?File=Pagefile.TXT > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My memory is failing me as to why the recommended minimum paging file is >> 1.5x >> RAM. Why not 1x or 2x? Why 1.5x specifically? >> >> I'm almost positive I used to know why - but my google-fu and personal >> list archive are also failing me today. >> >> I'm interested because I've got a new junior subboardinate whom I'm >> trying to instill a general understanding of concepts with, along with >> the benefits of creating and using a personal reference database. >> Plus, I hate not knowing the "why" for something... :-) >> >> Here are my current notes on paging file optimization: >> >> http://www.espinola.net/wiki/Paging_file_optimization >> >> Not detailed (yet), but they are to the point. Would anyone care to >> take a peek and tell me if I'm missing something? >> >> TIA! >> >> -- >> ME2 >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
