That covers what I have seen from XP...BUT it creates a fixed 1.5 and will 
never change it automatically if you change the amount of ram. So I would call 
that semi-system managed. Actually I would call that broken :)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 3:30 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Why is the min. rec. paging file size 1.5x?
> 
> "the operating system will create a page file that is one and a half
> times the amount of RAM that is installed in your computer."
> 
> Which is, as I understand it, the system managed default.  Or am I
> mistaken?
> 
> --
> ME2
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:23 PM, johonn2 _ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here you go...
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654
> >
> > "There is no specific recommendation for page file size. Your
> > requirements will be based on the hardware and software that you use
> > and the load that you put on the computer. To monitor page file usage
> > and requirements, run System Monitor, and gather a log during typical
> > usage conditions. Focus on the following counters."
> >
> >
> > On 1/27/09, Micheal Espinola Jr <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> My memory is failing me as to why the recommended minimum paging
> file is
> >> 1.5x
> >> RAM.  Why not 1x or 2x? Why 1.5x specifically?
> >>
> >> I'm almost positive I used to know why - but my google-fu and
> personal
> >> list archive are also failing me today.
> >>
> >> I'm interested because I've got a new junior subboardinate whom I'm
> >> trying to instill a general understanding of concepts with, along
> with
> >> the benefits of creating and using a personal reference database.
> >> Plus, I hate not knowing the "why" for something...  :-)
> >>
> >> Here are my current notes on paging file optimization:
> >>
> >> http://www.espinola.net/wiki/Paging_file_optimization
> >>
> >> Not detailed (yet), but they are to the point. Would anyone care to
> >> take a peek and tell me if I'm missing something?
> >>
> >> TIA!
> >>
> >> --
> >> ME2
> >>
> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >>
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to