Because no SOHO will by Ultimate? There are so many other examples of wacked out feature split I'm comfortable with believing they're happy over complicating the versions for whatever reason.
-- Mike Gill -----Original Message----- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Dell Latitude E Series 1st Impression -----Original Message----- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] Subject: RE: Dell Latitude E Series 1st Impression > [They should add: "Actually, you CAN'T protect your key information - > because we crippled this version and didn't provide encryption - > sorry!"] Well, encryption only protects you against one information loss vector (data at rest). There are many other ways to lose your data, and saying that you "CAN'T" protect your data because Bitlocker is missing is incorrect. That said, there's a tradeoff. If you lock yourself out of a bitlocker-ed machine, you're SoL. The support issues would be enormous for Microsoft dealing with poorly run SOHO type outfits that accidently enable Bitlocker without doing the necessary planning around key escrow/backup. Cheers Ken ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
