Security through obscurity is not security you can rely on. It has value, but 
it isn't real security because it provides nothing that can be relied on.

Cheers
Ken

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2009 8:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SECURING WIFI ROUTER

I really hate this trite expression.  It's filled with condecension and a my 
way is the only right way point of view.  It fails to value the role of 
obscurity in security.

If obscurity had no value, honeypots would be useless.

If obscurity had no value, Sun-Tzu wouldn't have said " if you are formless, 
the most penetrating spies will not be able to discern you, or the wisest 
counsels will not be able to do calculations against you."

Obcurity is part of security, security is a process, and just like any process, 
a missing piece is a missing piece and leave you more vulnerable.  Arguments 
for security should not begin with security through obscurity is false 
security, but should begin with security through obscurity is not enough 
security.


On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Sean Rector 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

He's right on the money.  Security through obscurity is a false security.



Sean Rector, MCSE



From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:47 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SECURING WIFI ROUTER



No no no.   Those recommendations should be dismissed, they are so "yesterday's 
idea of security".  For anyone who really wants to get in, working around MAC 
filtering and non-broadcast SID's is a piece of cake.  Secure the router or 
access point with WPA2 and a strong PSK if you can't do 802.1x authentication.  
 When properly secured, it doesn't matter if you're visible or whether your MAC 
is allowed or not.



Further reading:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/index.php?p=43

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=454

http://www.icsalabs.com/icsa/docs/html/communities/WLAN/wp_ssid_hiding.pdf



Carl



From: Lee Douglas [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SECURING WIFI ROUTER



In terms of securing, I've seen recommendations to NOT have the router 
broadcast its SID as well as using MAC filtering. I'm sure all can likely be 
circumvented, but they just add extra layers and make your neighbors that much 
more attractive..

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Webb, Brian (Corp) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I've seen the same message as well with an HP laptop going to a D-Link WIFI 
using WPA.  The message seems to indicate that you are connected to unsecured 
network, but I've always been connected to my secured network when I've checked.

-Brian


-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Ognenoff 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SECURING WIFI ROUTER

I've seen that happen too, with the plain old Windows wireless client.  WPA2 in 
my instance, as well.  I never did figure out what the problem was but I 
stopped using WIFI a year ago and just wired my house with CAT5e. At the time 
it was a Linksys WRT54GL with DD-WRT and an Intel integrated wlan card in a 
ThinkPad T60.

 - Andy O.
________________________________________

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SECURING WIFI ROUTER

Mmm... this doesn't sound like a popup that I am familiar with Windows being 
capable of generating.  It won't even pop up that message with a Wide Open 
wireless connection (No password needed).

Could it be the security center letting you know that the firewall is off, 
windows update is off, or that virus defs are old?

If not that, I suspect it's your AV telling you something, or spyware.

________________________________________
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SECURING WIFI ROUTER
I hope this is on topic. I have a Dell 700m laptop and a Netgear rangemax mimo 
"G" router. I'm using WPA2, but from time to time, a baloon pops up from the 
icon in the systray stating that my connection is unsecure. If I right click 
and select "view wireless networks" it indicates that my network is in fact 
secured with WPA2. Any ideas why I get the baloon, and is there another way to 
insure that I am WPA2 secured in fact? I've noticed this for months now.

Murray








~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~












Information Technology Manager
Virginia Opera Association

E-Mail:         [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Phone:        (757) 213-4548 (direct line)
{+}
> 2008-2009 Season:  Tosca<http://www.vaopera.org/tosca> |  The Barber of 
> Seville<http://www.vaopera.org/barber>
> Recently Announced:  Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season 
> 2009-2010<http://www.vaopera.org/upcoming>
Visit us online at www.vaopera.org<http://www.vaopera.org/> or call 
1-866-OPERA-VA
________________________________
This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons unnamed as 
recipients may not read, distribute, copy or alter this e-mail. Any views or 
opinions expressed in this e-mail belong to the author and may not necessarily 
represent those of Virginia Opera. Although precautions have been taken to 
ensure no viruses are present, Virginia Opera cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that may arise from the use of this e-mail or attachments.

{*}











~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to