Please someone call the Waaaaaaa-bulance :) Shook
-----Original Message----- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Another screen sharing gizmo (free) from Microsoft "SharedView" True, but I just dont like seeing apps like this encapsulated through HTTP. Its not what it was intended for. They should at least have the decency to pick another port for this sort of thing. Plus, I had to come in a couple of hours early today, and I needed to complain about something. ;-) -- ME2 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, encapsulated connections are here to stay. > > I agree that they should be encrypted. > > It's not exactly as if it is a Microsoft specific thing. SSL VPNs, ssh > tunneling - lots of examples in the OSS world too. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:38 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Another screen sharing gizmo (free) from Microsoft "SharedView" > > Decisions, decisions! :-) > > -- > ME2 > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Michael B. Smith > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you saying that encapsulated communications are bad? >> >> Or that unencrypted encapsulated communications are bad? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:14 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: Another screen sharing gizmo (free) from Microsoft > "SharedView" >> >> Good to see Microsoft still supports bitching things through port 80. >> Way to go - not. >> >> -- >> ME2 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Similar but different. Netmeeting is point to point. SharedView >>> appears to communicate through Microsoft servers on ports 80 and 443 so >>> firewalls should not be a problem. In netmeeting you have an optional >>> ILS server which is basically just a list of names and IP addresses. >>> Sharedview requires you to login to a "passport" type of login and then >>> you can easily send an email to the other end which has a URL with the >>> session name and password embedded (they just need to click the link and >>> you need to accept). >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:19 PM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Subject: Re: Another screen sharing gizmo (free) from Microsoft >>> "SharedView" >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron) >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_SharedView >>> >>> Sounds like NetMeeting all over again. >>> >>> -- Ben >>> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >>> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >>> >>> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
