Do you have any numbers to post on the difference in throughput? For instance, time to respond after clicking on a directory in explorer in a directory with, say 1k files in it? Or downloading a largish (10mbytes, perhaps) attachment in Outlook, or browsing a large inbox or other folder in Outlook?
That might help me sell this to management after the first of the fiscal year. Kurt On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 13:57, Malcolm Reitz <[email protected]> wrote: > I have many much higher latency links than what you are describing > (satellite) and the Riverbeds are crucial for performance in those situations. > > -Malcolm > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:41 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: WAN / Application Optimizer > > How well do they fare in high-latency environments, such as between an > office in Redmond and one on either the UK or AU? > > Kurt > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:53, Martin Blackstone <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> MAPI and CIFS traffic kick a** over Riverbed! >> >> >> >> From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 4:56 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: WAN / Application Optimizer >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> We use Riverbeds extensively in our WAN environment and they make a big >> difference in performance for most applications. >> >> >> >> -Malcolm >> >> >> >> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:38 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: WAN / Application Optimizer >> >> >> >> We are a Riverbed partner and use them as well. >> >> Very nice. People love em! >> >> >> >> From: Cesare' A. Ramos [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:34 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: WAN / Application Optimizer >> >> >> >> Hellos. >> >> >> >> Anyone out there using any type of WAN / Application Optimizer such as >> Riverbed? >> >> >> >> We are looking around and wanted some thoughts. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> CAR >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> This e-Mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended >> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >> If you have received this e-Mail in error please notify the sender via >> returned e-Mail. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this >> e-Mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those >> of the company. Although IDF operates anti-virus programs, it does not >> accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses >> being passed. >> >> ** Think before you print this message. ** >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
