Ah. That is indeed trickier. I don't think I have a good answer for you on this - at the least, I'd have to give it more serious thought, though I expect that there are some directives you could plug into squid to do what you need.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 14:45, Andy Ognenoff <[email protected]> wrote: > The tricky part that I can’t seem to figure out is that I need outbound 80 > and 443 for *some* sites over the Metro-E connection. The goal would be to > use the Metro-E connection for SaaS apps we subscribe to and then use the T1 > for things like Google, news sites, etc. all from the same workstation. > > - Andy O. > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:27 PM >>To: NT System Admin Issues >>Subject: Re: OT: Bandwidth Splitting? >> >>Perfect case for a squid box. Just make the default gateway on the >>squid box point to the router for the T1. Then you just have to >>configure the proxy settings on the clients to use the squid box, and >>you can then deny all outbound port 80 for the Metro-E link. >> >>That is, assuming that your network is set up to take advantage of >>that. I have a subnet between my core switch and my firewalls that is >>relatively unpopulated, except for my squid box and my mail gateway, >>so I can do just that sort of thing. >> >>Kurt >> >>On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 13:57, Andy Ognenoff <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm not really sure how to explain what I want to do, what tech to use, >>or >>> if it's even possible so here it goes: >>> >>> I have 2 Internet connections, a standard T1 and a Metro-E fiber >>connection. >>> I'm not interested in traditional load balancing or failover, I just want >>to >>> use the Metro-E connection for critical business web sites and web apps >>and >>> all my servers would use that as well, and then use the T1 for things >>like >>> non-critical business stuff, general surfing, etc... >>> >>> Is it possible to do this, where an individual client would be using 2 >>> different gateways to the Internet based on the site or service they were >>> trying to access? >>> >>> - Andy O. >> >>~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >>~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
