I have tools that tell me WHAT port is open, but nothing to tell me what app
has the port open. What do you guys use?

 

This may be a wrong answer to your question ? But, when I use a ""stand
alone network system"" to download,read or surf to bad and known unsafe
websites etc. I always have a program called active ports running in the
background and watch what ports,programs files are either opened or started
after I go to any of the evil sites.

 

Google = Active Ports 1.2 Free

 

 Gene C.

In Memory of my little brother
http://genec-lori.com/

PackRat GarageSale
http://genec-lori.biz/

Genes-Computers Inc.
Yulee ,Fl
Established 1981, Microsoft OEM Registered member, system builder & Active
registered Microsoft Partner
Active Charter Partner of The Association of System Builders and Integrators
If you think you're beaten, Then you are!
If you give up the fight, Accept it !!

  _____  

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Too to find what .exe has a port open

 

I would use Nmap to do your scanning, and then use Process Explorer from
sysinternals to find out which .exe has the port open. 

 

BTW: GO PENN STATE NIT Champs: 

 

BSME PENN STATE 1996..

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

[email protected]

Phone:401-639-3505

  _____  

From: andy [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Too to find what .exe has a port open

 

I recently scanned some of my computers with a languard beta scanner that I
have been using for years.  And then scanned some computers on my subnet and
then on other subnets.  They all showed ports 25 and 110 open.  Since I
never got false results from my languard beta in years, I immediately
suspected that all of these computers were infected with some type of spam
bot.  I picked out one machine and installed every type of free port monitor
on it that I could find.  All results showed that that the ports 25 and 110
are not open.  I think our firewall guys, they just started installing and
learning about firewalls, have it setup so that the firewall intercepts any
telnet session to 25 or 110 and gives it a window.  Is this possible?

 I have not tried moving my languard beta scanner outside the firewall to
test the ports.

On another note, a few years ago, I used the languard scanner to look for a
trojan that was infecting computers and found a port open on a linux machine
that corresponded to the port the trojan was infecting.  Come to find out,
the linux machine was using some type of proprietary software that used the
same port as the trojan.  We said, eh ok, you are clean, you can get back on
the network. 


At 02:47 PM 4/9/2009, Derek Lidbom wrote:

Are they UDP ports?
 
Does it say immediately after it checks them that they are closed again?
 
My guess would be Languard see the port number and immediately associates
with Trojan, without checking to see if it is udp or tcp.
 
 
 
From: David Lum [ mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Too to find what .exe has a port open
 
NETSTAT.I shoulda known
 
Netstat -ano shows nothing in that range.
 
Hey, if you have TCPView running when you also run a Nessus scan on same
system.now that's funny right there.
 
Nessus shows nothing, TCPView shows nothing, NETSTAT shows nothing.only
Languard shows something at those ports.
 
Dave
 
From: Michael B. Smith [ <mailto:[email protected]>
mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:23 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Too to find what .exe has a port open
 
KISS
 
"netstat -ano". The "o" gives you the process owning the port, which you can
use TaskList or Task Manager to find.
 
If it isn't in the list - you've been pwned. (probably)
 

  _____  

From: David Lum [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Too to find what .exe has a port open
Perfect thanks!
 
Now I have something, or not.GFI Languard scanned a machine that says I have
two KiLo ports open (6666,6667). TCPView shows nothing in that
range..comments?
 
Dave
 
From: Jake Gardner [ mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Too to find what .exe has a port open
 
TCPView from SysInternals
 
Thanks,
 
Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246
 
 

  _____  

From: David Lum [ <mailto:[email protected]>  mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Too to find what .exe has a port open
I have tools that tell me WHAT port is open, but nothing to tell me what app
has the port open. What do you guys use? (yes probably discussed here
before.)
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
 

 

 

 

***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.? If you are not the
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.? 

 

Thank you.

 

*******************************************************************


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Derek Lidbom
Director of Technology and Interactive Development, Trone
336.812.2010
[email protected]

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the
designated recipients named above.  If you are not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of
it or its contents is prohibited.  If you have received this communication
in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and
deleting it from your computer.  Thank you. 

 

 



--------Andy-Ofalt---863-3449------405-Ag-Admin-Bldg------for more
information go  to  <http://ict.cas.psu.edu/Contacts.html%A0>
http://ict.cas.psu.edu/Contacts.html
<http://ict.cas.psu.edu/Contacts.html%A0> ---------- My little blurb to eat
up bandwidth and make your mail box even larger
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 The real problem is that IP, a connectionless protocol, was never developed
to be the universal protocol. ATM was developed to serve that purpose and
failed.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to