The logic is you shouldn't be running anything else on your DC.

That statement is nebulous. If I compromise WINS and run arbitrary code, I can 
own your AD. If I compromise DNS and run arbitrary code, I can own your AD. 
Anything that runs in the context of SYSTEM or NETWORK SERVICE on an RWDC 
pretty much has unfettered access to AD. By the logic below you shouldn't run 
DNS or WINS on DCs. If you want to give up AD integrated DNS, go for it...

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[email protected]

c - 312.731.3132

Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/
Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian

From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 11:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server OS opinion

I may be missing something, but that article didn't convince me.

It says: "...[I]f you're running your DHCP server on a domain controller then 
an attacker who compromises your DHCP server gains access to your accounts 
database and can cause all sorts of further problems."

That's true, but that's a big "if." Is this something that's known to happen on 
a regular enough basis to be a concern? Or is the logic that the attack surface 
of a DC should be minimized by running absolutely nothing else on it?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us<http://www.taylor.k12.fl.us>




From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server OS opinion

Security.

http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/DHCP-Security-Part1.html
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 8:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server OS opinion

What's the reasoning for no DHCP on a DC - besides the extra stuff you need
to do to make DNS updates work correctly?

We're a very small shop with only 1 domain/2 DCs and I'm implementing DHCP
soon - again, migrating from Netware.

 - Andy O.
________________________________________
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server OS opinion

1) Full Install, with minimal roles, unless core will do it for me and not
be an admin headache.
2) Enterprise Edition X64 for E2k7 in a 4 node cluster GEO-Cluster for FT
and HA.
3) Domain Controller not with DHCP put that role on a separate server
protected, ( Standard Edition)
4) File server, Standard edition, implement file blocking, quotas, and ABE.
5) Always take a minimalist approach, still like gui tools, but if you can
do all the stuff from the cmdline or via POSH then you GTG.

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
[email protected]
Phone:401-639-3505
________________________________________
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Server OS opinion

Until Server 2008 R2, there is no .NET Framework with Server Core, so
anything that relies on .NET (e.g. Exchange) isn't going to work.

Administration via GUI can be done remotely (though I suppose sometimes you
have to do things at the console) so no having a gui isn't a big -ve in my
opinion. I would add your Hyper-V hosts to a domain to make it easier to
manage remotely.

Cheers
Ken

________________________________________
From: Glen Johnson [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2009 10:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Server OS opinion
What flavor of server 08 would you choose for these servers?
Core or full install.
Exchange 07
Domain controller with DHCP.
File server for user home directories.
In your opinion does the reduced attack surface and fewer patches outweigh
the convenience of having the gui tools and such installed?
I've also got a couple of hyper v hosts and unless someone can convince me
otherwise, core will go on them.
Any advice or horror stories appreciated.


Glen Johnson
LAN Admin
Virginia Highlands Community College
PO Box 828, Abingdon, VA 24212
phone: (276)739-2467 fax: (276)739-2590
www.vhcc.edu<http://www.vhcc.edu>









~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~












~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to