Also consider testing with someone else's DNS or your forwarders. OpenDNS 
perhaps.....


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:41 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: DNS issue
> 
> The domains in question do have MX records, but the DNS lookup failures
> end
> up giving us A records only, and then exchange tries to deliver to the
> A
> record address, which accepts mail for a different domain.
> 
> We've offered logging; we need them to approve the costs first... No
> bind in
> this org.
> 
> Someone sent me a note about a known issue with the Watchguards. I'm
> going
> to look at that today...
> 
> ***********************
> Charlie Kaiser
> [email protected]
> Kingman, AZ
> ***********************
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:34 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: DNS issue
> >
> >   If a domain name has no MX records, but does have A
> > records, then SMTP MTAs are supposed to treat the domain as
> > if it had specified the hosts at those A records as the mail
> > exchangers.  This is per the relevant RFC.
> >
> >   Does it happen for "all" domains, or just some?
> >
> >   As someone else said, query logging would be good.  Another
> > thing to try is a packet sniffer.  (Sometimes that's even
> > better, because you might see stuff that the person
> > programming an application's logging routines didn't think
> > was relevant.)
> >
> >   In the NT 4.0 days, I sometimes fixed deficiencies in the
> > NT 4.0 DNS server by having it forward all DNS queries to a
> > local ISC BIND "named" resolver which then did the
> > Internet-facing stuff.  The MS DNS server was much improved
> > in Win 2000, but it's a thought if you get desperate.
> >
> > > What I'm trying to find out is this: Is there a way to prevent
> > > server-side caching of negative replies to remote DNS queries?
> >
> >   The normal control for this is the "minimum TTL" field from
> > the SOA record of the zone being queried.
> >
> >   Microsoft's documentation seems to imply that they just use that:
> > "The Windows 2000 DNS server caches negative responses
> > according to the minimum TTL in the SOA record. However, it
> > cannot be less than one minute or greater than 15 minutes."
> >
> > (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc959309.aspx)
> >
> > -- Ben
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource
> > hog! ~ ~
> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to