It really depends on what you are looking for.  You can go into the
switch and use a "show interface" command to see statistics on that port
since it was last reset.  Assuming that the port counters were all reset
at the same time, you could look at the input/output counters on all the
ports to see which one is the "busiest".  You can also see the amount of
traffic over the last 5 minutes, but there is no other historical data
kept long term on the switch.
 
What MRTG does is polls the switch via SNMP at some interval and gives
you long term graphs.  This is the better way to get good information
and it is true that it would require some configuration--SNMP would have
to be enabled on the switch, and MRTG would have to be configured to
monitor the relevant ports.  Of course, you would have to wait some
interval to collect enough data to have meaningful results.  How
hard/easy it is to configure MRTG to do this is directly related to the
person's level of comfort with MRTG; enabling SNMP on a switch is
trivial.
 
Bill Mayo

________________________________

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco Catalyst 2950 / 3550 info



How hard is it to get a report on traffic for each port on Cisco 2950's
and3550's? I know our network guy uses MRTG for some things, but I'm
getting resistance to asking him to tell me which port is generating the
most traffic. The current response is "there needs to be a config change
to get that data".

 

I have experience with Dell managed switches (PowerConnect 5324 and the
like) and it's a simple matter to find which port has passed (is
passing) the most traffic, so I am skeptical about the amount of effort
required on a Cisco switch to achieve the same thing...

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to