What if I want to make domain administrators (or anouther security group) able 
to log on without group policy restictions?

________________________________
From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy Problem - I've lost all my hair

If you have blocked inheritance at that OU, then it shouldn't receive any 
polices above that OU level.  You use loopback processing when you want the 
same *user* policies to apply to a computer, regardless of who logs on.  Say 
for example you have a logon script applied via GPO to some of your users at 
their OU level.  This logon script does some things that you don't want to 
happen if they log onto some specific computer/server.  What you do is setup 
the OU in which the computer/server sits with a user policy that you do want 
applied and turn on loopback processing.  When you log onto computers in that 
OU, ALL users will then get the settings that you have specified in that 
policy, and not the policies from their home OU.  This does assume, of course, 
that the computer OU is not inheriting the same policy due to OU structure.

Bill

________________________________
From: Owens, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy Problem - I've lost all my hair

I had disabled inheritance on that OU, so the OUs further down the tree should 
not grab any other policies either, correct? should loopback be enabled or 
disabled on THIS policy?

________________________________
From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy Problem - I've lost all my hair

If the servers/computers are not included in the security filtering, then the 
policy will not affect them.  Whether or not this is a problem has to do with 
the policies invoked within the GPO.  If all the policy items are user 
configuration items, then it will make no difference.  If there are computer 
configuration items in the policy, then the security has to be set to include 
the servers/computers.  If you have a mixture, you need to ensure that the GPO 
applies to the computer(s) and user(s).  This is the default; it is only an 
issue if it has been changed.

The other thing I would mention is that you might need to check to see if there 
are any other policies that invoke loopback processing.  When this is in effect 
(on a computer object), it applies policies from the OU of the computer only 
(more info at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287, if you are unfamiliar 
with this).

Bill Mayo


________________________________
From: Owens, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy Problem - I've lost all my hair

The only security filter I have in place is tied to a security group that the 
account (lab rat) is a member of. Should I specify the servers in there as 
well? The server that works is not a member of that security group.

________________________________
From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy Problem - I've lost all my hair

If a policy applied at the OU level is not affecting all the computers in the 
OU, the first thing I would suspect is that security filtering is in place.  
Have you confirmed that the Security Filtering section shows Authenticated 
Users having (read) permissions to the policy?  You may have to go to the 
Delegation tab to see all the permissions applied.

Bill Mayo

________________________________
From: Owens, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Group Policy Problem - I've lost all my hair


All-

I seem to have a problem with GPO replication. I think. I am not really sure 
what the problem is - it just confuses me at this point. Here is the deal.

I have a 7 server TS farm. They all run server 2008 64 bit edition, but I 
believe the problem is something with our DCs. Our domain is 2003.

 Server 1 has the licenses, and distributes them out accordingly. I added a GPO 
to it, to lock them down. All servers are in the same OU, and my test account 
is in a different OU with the same GPO applied to it. The servers are named 
STUCTX0x. STUCTX01 takes any group policy change I give it. If I change the 
GPO, and run a gpupdate /force... STUCTX01 takes the GPO when I log in on my 
test account. (lab rat) On STUCTX02-STUCTX07 it doesn't work. I logged onto the 
DC, and used the GP modeling wizard to simulate logging onto STUCTX02 with lab 
rat. It says it will pull the correct policies. So, I logged onto STUCTX02 and 
did a "gpresult /user lrat /v" It gives me "INFO: The user "lrat" does not have 
RSOP data."

When I do that on stuctx01, it pulls the correct policy. Replication otherwise 
on the domain controllers appear to be working correctly. How do I get it to 
apply to all of the servers in that OU? Everything looks right to me, and I do 
not even know what to look at next!



Thanks guys,

Mike



________________________________
This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.









________________________________
This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.









________________________________
This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.









________________________________
This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to