I always prefered ATDTw8655309 <g> Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _____ From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 9:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT antique modem AT+++ ATE1 ATL1 ATM1 ATV1 ATX4 ATDT8675309 . AT+++ ATH0 -sc From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT antique modem You know, I always do that. Hayes 110! -- ME2 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote: 150 ? Or did you mean 110 ??? ( yep, I'm *that* old <g> ) Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _____ From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 6:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT antique modem My first was a 150, and then quickly to a 300. Bulletin boards and free Internet access via MIT mainframe servers pre-WWW (all you had to do was ask!). Back when DNS didnt exist and you had to keep and trade sheets of IP addresses. -- ME2 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Reimer, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: I also had a 300, but on a Toshiba T1000, first Toshiba laptop (I think). I hit BB's with it, didn't do any surfing. Still hook up to a phone system for log downloads etc, at 300 baud, but using a 2400 to do it. Mark From: Daniel E. Rodriguez [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 6:02 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT antique modem Mine was a 300 but on a Vic-20. Daniel E. Rodriguez ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
