I never said they weren't susceptible to malware, just that they are LESS
susceptible to malware. Less =/=0 :-)

 

I specifically said "That's not to say that it's not possible to infect a
Unix-based O/S,

just that it's a LOT harder to do than a Windows O/S."

 

Just a clarification as it appears you misread my post. J

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 3:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mac Anti-Malware

 

Well the first internet malware was a UNIX worm...

 

In any case, I'd be careful asserting that for the most part "based on

UNIX" = "not susceptible to malware".

 

I've been admin around UNIX-based boxen for years... and all the system

vendors put out security patches... many of which can be exploitable...

 

-sc

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]

> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 1:16 PM

> To: NT System Admin Issues

> Subject: RE: Mac Anti-Malware

> 

> *nix (Unix, Linux, *BSD) is much more difficult to infect, as you

don't

> automatically have "admin" privileges the way you do in the Windows

> world.

> By default when you create a new account on a stand-alone PC, that

> account

> has Admin privileges which most viruses and other malware can exploit

> to

> infect the O/S.

> Unix-based operating systems (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Mac OS/X, etc)

> do not

> give normal users the right to run code with elevated privileges,

which

> is

> what would be needed to infect the O/S. Let's say you wanted to

install

> a

> piece of software. Under most unix-based operating systems (I'm not

> familiar

> with *all* variants, so I'm saying "most" to cover my butt) you have

to

> be

> "root" or equivalent to install software. The O/S won't LET you

install

> software.

> In Windows most users have the ability to install software (unless

they

> are

> specifically denied that by virtue of having been given special

reduced

> privileges.)

> That's not to say that it's not possible to infect a Unix-based O/S,

> just

> that it's a LOT harder to do than a Windows O/S.

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]

> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:38 PM

> To: NT System Admin Issues

> Subject: RE: Mac Anti-Malware

> 

> " For the most part that is true, as OS X is based on Unix (BSD to be

> exact,

> I think.)"

> 

> Please to be explaining.

> 

> 

> -sc

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: John Aldrich <[email protected]>

> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:34 PM

> To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]>

> Subject: RE: Mac Anti-Malware

> 

> That's a good question. The most common answer you're going to find is

> "we

> don't need antivirus/anti-malware." For the most part that is true, as

> OS X

> is based on Unix (BSD to be exact, I think.) That being said, there

has

> been

> some recently publicized (in this list even, I think J) activity that

> warrants looking for anti-malware on the Mac.

> 

> My suggestion would be to check the "usual suspects": McAfee, AVG,

> Symantec

> (YUCK!), etc.

> 

> I just did a little bit of looking (not much, mind) and the ONLY thing

> I

> found was Avast! has a Mac version. Trend Micro (maker of PC-Cillin

and

> host

> of the free on-line virus scanner "antivirus.com") makes a Mac version

> of

> their stuff, so it's available. You just have to look a lot harder to

> find

> it than with Windows anti-malware. J

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]]

> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:21 PM

> To: NT System Admin Issues

> Subject: Mac Anti-Malware

> 

> 

> 

> What is a good Mac OS X(?) Anti-Malware software?  I have zero

> experience

> with Mac's and was just instructed to begin looking for some software

> for

> one.  Anyone got a good recommendation they will offer up?

> 

> 

> 

> Thanks and I am off to see what is out there.

> 

> 

> 

> Jon Harris

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> No virus found in this incoming message.

> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.53/2154 - Release Date:

> 06/04/09

> 05:53:00

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

> 

> 

> No virus found in this incoming message.

> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.53/2154 - Release Date:

> 06/04/09

> 05:53:00

> 

> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 

Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.53/2154 - Release Date: 06/04/09
05:53:00


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to