We have had a case open with PSS on the same issue. Only difference is we aren't going against a cluster.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Ken Schaefer<[email protected]> wrote: > Including documentation... > > Been working with PSS for several weeks now trying to get this product > working with SharePoint in a least privilege environment, where the backend > data is on a shared enterprise SQL Server cluster. It's not really obvious > what the requirements are permissions wise... > > Cheers > Ken > > ________________________________ > From: Brian Desmond [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2009 4:17 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: DPM-2007 > > It’d be all of the above from your list. > > > > It does some very slick stuff but unfortunately needs A LOT of polish still. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Desmond > > [email protected] > > > > c - 312.731.3132 > > > > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:19 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: DPM-2007 > > > > Good luck finding much at all about DPM... Seems like either no one is using > it, or there is just very little info on it anywhere. The way DPM uses tape > is not very straight forward. > > > > Bob Fronk > > P Please print only as needed. > > > > > > > > > > From: Glen Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:21 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: DPM-2007 > > > > Just learning this thing and wondering if anyone has found a way to use > removable/portable esata drives instead of tapes for long term storage. > > I can’t believe that MS didn’t think of this or at least considering it. > > I’m not finding much googling or binging now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
