I may not have played with HyperV very much, but I didn't find moving VM's to be any easier than with ESXi. Of course with a SAN and/or VirtualCenter moving VM's is fairly trivial.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: > No to VMWare server. > > Qualified yes to ESXi - it's damned painful if you have to move VMs > between machines, and getting SSH running is not terribly intuitive, > but it's definitely doable. > > Sun has a virtualization product called VirtualBox, but I don't know > its licensing status or capabilities, and there's also Virtual Iron, > which I've heard good things about but haven't used, and also don't > know the licensing for. > > This is a decent place to start looking: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_virtualization > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 14:15, Matthew W. Ross<[email protected]> > wrote: > > Greetings, List. > > > > There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and > it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server > solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently looking > at the free products: > > > > VMWare Server 2.0 > > ESXi > > XenServer > > Hyper-V > > Any others I've missed. > > > > I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products, > and express any useful experiences you've had. > > > > Thanks all, > > > > > > --Matt Ross > > Ephrata School District > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
