I learned long ago that it may be satisfying to say "I told you so", but when they come to get you they don't care what the memo said. Best to smile or at least grimace and make it work.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Erik Goldoff<[email protected]> wrote: > NOPE, then they give you the opportunity to be happier elsewhere <g> > > > > Erik Goldoff > IT Consultant > Systems, Networks, & Security > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:08 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Terminal Services question > > You're allowed to kick and scream along the way, though, right? > > Joe Heaton > Employment Training Panel > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:55 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Terminal Services question > > Yep, I've seen both sides of the fence ... Some corporate setups where they > did not want to budget for remote equipment, and executive level insisted on > enabling remote access for POE ... Sometimes you just have to do what the > business decides > > > > Erik Goldoff > IT Consultant > Systems, Networks, & Security > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:29 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Terminal Services question > > For me it's the opposite. I only allow approved machines/users to get remote > access of any kind. No POE at all unless approved at C level... > > It's all in how you define your criteria, I guess. > > *********************** > Charlie Kaiser > [email protected] > Kingman, AZ > *********************** > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 12:55 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Terminal Services question >> >> privately owned equipment is a presumption on my part based on 'home' >> access ... Although some agencies deploy govt owned equipment, they're > >> normally issued along with a vpn/remote access solution built in, at >> least with my experience with Federal govt... >> >> >> >> Erik Goldoff >> IT Consultant >> Systems, Networks, & Security > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
