Not really.  I ran with both done for a few months before bringing up our
first 2003 DC.  Now the conversion to 2008 I did not even bother with the
fall back but then I am still running at the 2000 forest/domain level
anyway.

Jon

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Yep, FALLBACK is my concern.  I'll be doing most of the work remotely, as
> the two new 2003 servers are in place and on the wire.  Low level help desk
> type will be on site, but as of yet, no spare/temp machine as a 2000 DC ...
> ( I normally bring in my laptop with a 2000 server and a 2003 server running
> virtually and promote to DC to grab a copy for 'just in case' in the first
> few days, but I won't be on site this time )
>
> once forestprep & domainprep run, it's a one way race to the finish
>
>  Erik Goldoff
>
> *IT  Consultant*
>
> *Systems, Networks, & Security *
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:05 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Win2003 DC on Win2000 domain
>
>   Agreed.  The only difference is since you have Exchange on a DC you
> might want to make a 2000 DC on some desktop as a fall back.  Once the fall
> back is finished with the sync turn it off.  Do the domain/forest prep if
> all go well put the fall back on the network again let it sync again then
> turn it off while bringing up the new DC's.  Once all is well and good bring
> it up and kill it off.
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM, KenM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why not just install 2003 on the new hardware run dcpromo /forestprep and
>> /domainprep and run dcpromo on 2003 servers and transfer roles.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Client wants to bring in two new servers ( forklift new hardware ) into
>>> their current Windows 2000 domain, but wants to upgrade Active Directory to
>>> 2003 ... two new servers will ultimately replace two existing 2000 servers
>>> which are File/Print/DC  and Exchange/DC
>>>
>>> My normally cautious method would be to bring in a temp 2000 box, promote
>>> it to DC in the 2000 domain, move FSMOs to it, then demote existing DCs...
>>> upgrade OS on temp box to 2003, then promote new 2003 servers to DC, moving
>>> FSMOs to one of them.
>>>
>>> Question :  Is there an unreasonable risk to promoting a 2003 server to
>>> DC on the 2000 domain with 2000 DCs in place when there is no plan ( or
>>> license ) to upgrade the OS on the 2000 boxes to 2003 ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Erik Goldoff
>>>
>>> *IT  Consultant*
>>>
>>> *Systems, Networks, & Security *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to