Old school arguments are the hardest to follow. -- ME2
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sherry Abercrombie<[email protected]> wrote: > If you're talking to me, you've got me confused with someone else. > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Oh, Sherry. You should have just told us it was you. >> >> >> >> I’ll email the instructions off-line. >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> From: Rebecca Van Acker [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 8:45 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> Drew Nicholson. >> >> And I don't need a cookie with instructions, moron. Fuck off and die, >> idiot. >> >> Sweetly, >> >> ~Pie >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:42:23 -0400 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> And who are you sweetie pie? >> >> >> >> Care to tell me what it is you are commenting on? If you can, I’ll give >> you a cookie, complete with instructions. >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> From: Rebecca Van Acker [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 8:38 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> And why would you? >> >> Obsess much? >> >> Good god. >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:55:25 -0700 >> >> I haven’t heard from him in ages though. >> >> >> >> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 6:39 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> Hence the reason for verbing his name. >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 1:29 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> Yes, I know, but I liked him even if I did argue with him more often than >> not, so I did. >> >> >> >> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 12:50 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> HTSNBN! >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:46 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> LOL. Yes it did. Poor Drew…. >> >> >> >> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 8:32 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> Hmmm “Day 0” meant something else on an another list long, long ago in a >> galaxy far, far away… >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:23 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> You have no idea Dave,,, 0 days are killing me J >> >> >> >> Z >> >> >> >> Edward Ziots >> >> Network Engineer >> >> Lifespan Organization >> >> MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + >> >> [email protected] >> >> Phone:401-639-3505 >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:09 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> I got the joke, maybe EZ is under too much stress these days? >> >> >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 7:02 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> That reply was a lame attempt at humor implying why don't we just killbit >> everything... >> >> >> >> -Paul >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 8:59 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> I believe there was something on the Patch management list about >> slayocx.vbs which could be called from a script and would do a commandline >> type setoff the kill bit. >> >> >> >> Z >> >> >> >> Edward Ziots >> >> Network Engineer >> >> Lifespan Organization >> >> MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + >> >> [email protected] >> >> Phone:401-639-3505 >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:50 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> >> >> Does Microsoft have a command similar to "killbit *.*" Sheesh! >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 8:21 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Keeping us employed (link) >> >> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6778 >> >> >> >> I don’t see KB973472 on my WSUS server but it did sync the others >> yesterday, is this something newer? >> >> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER >> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION >> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Sherry Abercrombie > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." > Arthur C. Clarke > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
