+1 Can also confirm that this definitely works with SQL Server 2005 + Windows Server 2003
Cheers Ken From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2009 2:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Sql Drive letter in cluster question Mount points are definitely supported and are a common way here. I think SQL 2005 was the first SQL to support mount points. I would create one mountpoint LUN per cluster resource group and group things that way. Don't forget to create parent/child relationships between your mountpoints and parent LUNs. Thanks, Brian Desmond [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> c - 312.731.3132 Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/ Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian From: Greg Olson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Sql Drive letter in cluster question Hey all, Just a quick question to the group. How do you guys handle assigning drive letters in a SQL cluster group? For instance, I have a 4-node sql cluster, and every drive letter from A-Z is currently assigned. I was thinking of putting each DB and their log drive under a single drive letter using mount points under the letter to point to the different luns. My concern\question is doing this in a Microsoft cluster, is this a supported config? Thanks in advance for your input! -Greg Olson ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
