We are probably looking at no more than 4 people and most of the time just private conversation from one to another.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote: > don't think I ever had more than a dozen or two viewers, our problem was > usually the internet connection provided by the various hotels where the > cameras were ... but good to know about the limit > > Erik Goldoff > > *IT Consultant* > > *Systems, Networks, & Security * > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:49 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: webcam software > > Ustream works well, until you start getting a higher number of users, then > quality can drop. I think after fifty on one of our demos we started > getting hiccups. > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Kennedy, Jim < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> UStream is the bomb. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:44 AM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* RE: webcam software >> >> >> >> So your webcams are gonna be mobile with laptop users ?... >> >> >> >> One method I've used in the past to provide webcam views of charity >> fundraising events is to setup an account on Ustream ( >> http://www.ustream.tv/ ) and 'broadcast' , once setup they'll provide a >> URL for sharing (and other code in case you want to embed in your own web >> page) >> >> pretty simple, reliable, and free >> >> >> Erik Goldoff >> >> *IT Consultant* >> >> *Systems, Networks, & Security * >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:27 AM >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* Re: webcam software >> >> More info. sorry. already purchased MS Lifecam's. Using Thinkpad's with >> XP. Very mobile users. 3 different offices plus outside travel. would >> really like to be able to send and email with a link that the recipient >> would then click to make connection WITHOUT having to download client >> software. >> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What are they trying to accomplish ? Might be simpler to use IP webcams >> with built in http server instead of computer connected ... then have a >> port/address translation forward through firewall to IP webcam >> >> >> >> Then your clients can use pretty much whatever browser they have handy >> >> >> Erik Goldoff >> >> *IT Consultant* >> >> *Systems, Networks, & Security * >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:11 AM >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* webcam software >> >> Was recently asked to provide webcam's for 2 owners. I have never used >> one. Looking for recomendations for best software/tool to make "clientless" >> connections over the web??? >> >> >> >> thanks for any help. >> >> >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
