Maybe hang out outside and hand out tin foil hats as people leave.

 

From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: [WOT] FW: Presidential Address Sept. 8th

 

Have them be sure to burn any books that talk about dinosaurs or evolution
too.

 

 

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Gene Giannamore
<[email protected]> wrote:

WOT = way off topic or wide open throttle?

 

Anyway my bro-in-law wrote this J

 

 



 


Dear Livermore school officials, 

  

Here are two Internet links: 

 <http://www.ed.gov/index.jhtml> http://www.ed.gov/index.jhtml 

& 

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10582301/President-Obamaÿÿ
<http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10582301/President-Obama's-Address-to-Students-
Across-America-September-8-2009>
™s-Address-to-Students-Across-America-September-8-2009 

  

These links describe the President of the United States ÿÿ™ intent to
address pre-K to sixth graders live via the Internet. 

  

I am writing to ask for Livermore schools not to accept this broadcast live
and/or have an opt-in form sent to parents (so that parents would have to
agree to let their children view the speech).  

  

I ask this for the reasons below: 

  

1.      No Constitutional Authority.  The Federal government has no
authority to send curriculum to state schools and no authority to address
minors without parental permission.
2.      No politics in school.  There has been no national tragedy that the
president is reacting to.  The President is trying to set a precedent
whereby he may address our youth directly asserting his influence on
educational policy.  This is political in nature and subject to differences
of opinion to-which adults may debate but should be transparent to our youth
(especially 4-12 years old).  A live broadcast does not allow parents
sufficient time to counter the influence of the leader of the free worldÿÿ™s
perspective on education.
3.      No usurpation of parental rights.  Parents have the unequivocal
right to guide their children in matters of politics, religion, morality,
and etc.  The president may have rights and responsibilities to speak to the
public, but will violate parental rights by speaking to minors directly
without supplying a written transcript or preview of the broadcast.  
4.      No captive audience.  Without and Opt-in policy by the Livermore
Valley Joint Unified School District , our children will be a captive
audience to the influence of a politician.  I believe need not make mention
of historical abuses of this power by other nations.

  

No matter how benign the Presidential address may seem, it reduces our
liberty and our authority over our own children.  So if you do not force our
students to watch either by not broadcasting or having parents Opt-in, then
you show your dedication to parental rights and authority. 

  

Thank you, 

Livermore parents   

 

 

 




-- 
-- 

Gregory Waleed Kavalec
---------------------------------------------
What matters?...
Only the flicker of light within the darkness, 
the feeling of warmth within the cold, 
the knowledge of love within the void.
 — Joan Walsh Anglund




 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to