Sweet. What are you using to keep those all in sync? -----Original Message----- From: Jacob [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 12:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SATA RAID Performance
Actually, RAID0 does have its uses. We use RAID0 for the data on our web servers.. html files, images, videos. The o/s is on a single drive, the data is on a RAID0 with three drives. Huge performance gain. But, also... we have over 30 servers in the server farm. So if a hard drive in the RAID0 crashes, the other 29 servers can take up the slack without any issues. I lose on average about two to three hard drives a year among the 30 servers. Now, if you have one database server and you use RAID0..................... -----Original Message----- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SATA RAID Performance On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Phillip Partipilo <[email protected]> wrote: > Those are almost always software RAIDs, so your CPU would be doing all > of the parity processing on RAID5 so performance there would quite suck. It depends on the workload (and just how crappy the fake RAID implementation is). A lot of systems spend most of their CPU time idle, so using that for RAID doesn't hurt you much. Over in the land of Linux, for example, OS software RAID performance often blows even the best dedicated RAID hardware out of the water. (It helps that Linux's RAID implementation doesn't suck anywhere near as much as Windows' does.) I wouldn't do it on a web transaction host, SQL box, etc., but if it's a file server, static web content server, proxy cache, etc., sure. But given that the OP later states it's a gaming box, yah, I agree: Steer clear from fake/host/software RAID. >There appears very low overhead striping in a RAID0 ... At the cost of doubling your chance of system failure due to disk trouble. These days, I wouldn't touch RAID 0 with a ten foot cattle prod. > when you created a RAID1 set, it would read the data in a striping > pattern, essentially doubling read performance. Any decent RAID 1 implementation will do that. See above about implementations that suck. ;-) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
