Not an IronPort guy, but it sure looks like it's being delivered.
[email protected] is an interesting address... -sc From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction? You are correct it is from my Ironport. I am just not getting any of these messages to my phone. I can send from other phones. From Exchange/Outlook or Outlook Express. But anything coming from my Ironport is failing and it appears that the Ironport is passing it to AT&T??? ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven M. Caesare <mailto:[email protected]> To: NT System Admin Issues <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:17 AM Subject: RE: Is this a good SMTP transaction? What is this from? This doesn't appear to be an SMTP conversation, but rather the logs from an appliance (IronPort?) -sc From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Is this a good SMTP transaction? Protocol SMTP interface Data1 (IP 10.0.10.15) on incoming connection (ICID 215625) from sender IP 10.0.50.4. Reverse DNS host 03030611n4m055.imcu.local verified 1. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) (ICID 215625) RELAY sender group RELAYLIST match 10.0.50.4 SBRS rfc1918 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Start message 212050 on incoming connection (ICID 215625). 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 enqueued on incoming connection (ICID 215625) from [email protected]. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 on incoming connection (ICID 215625) added recipient ([email protected]). 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) SMTP delivery connection (DCID 157984) opened from IronPort interface 10.0.10.15 to IP address 66.102.165.114 on port 25. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 contains message ID header '<[email protected]>'. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 (825 bytes) from [email protected] ready. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 matched per-recipient policy DEFAULT for outbound mail policies. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 scanned by Anti-Virus engine Sophos. Interim verdict: CLEAN 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 scanned by Anti-Virus engine. Final verdict: Negative 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 queued for delivery. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:53 (GMT -0400) (DCID 157984) Delivery started for message 212050 to [email protected]. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:53 (GMT -0400) (DCID 157984) Delivery details: Message 212050 sent to [email protected] 15 Sep 2009 07:16:53 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 to [email protected] received remote SMTP response 'Message received: 20090915111653.udfi13119.atledge02.cingularme....@ironport.imcu.local'. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
