Cool... that sounded like configuration wonkiness.

-sc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:44 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Why is Windows Time service crap?
> 
> Found it.  We have 2 Windows NTP servers.  One hadn't been changed from
> NT5D5 to NTP, and the AnnounceFlags hadn't been changed from 10 to 5.
> Will look at everything tomorrow and see if things have sync'd up.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:36 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Why is Windows Time service crap?
> 
> Let me do some poking around...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:50 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Why is Windows Time service crap?
> 
> Multiple Windows machine are exactly 24 seconds behind multiple UNIX
> machines?
> 
> -sc
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 10:21 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Why is Windows Time service crap?
> >
> > I set up redundant time servers.  When I do a ntpq -p on all the Unix
> > servers, everything is in line with each other.  It appears the
> Windows
> > servers are the ones that are off.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:02 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Why is Windows Time service crap?
> >
> > Do you know for a fact that your UNIX box is not 24 seconds ahead?
> >
> > -sc
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:56 AM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Why is Windows Time service crap?
> > >
> > > I have Windows and Unix boxes pointing to the same sources, yet my
> > > Windows box is consistantly 24 seconds behind.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 6:54 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Re: Why is Windows Time service crap?
> > >
> > > I set both of my DCs in the HQ to sync to us.pool.ntp.org, and have
> > no
> > > issues.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:36,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Greetings!
> > > >
> > > > I have workstations and servers in my domain whose time is all
> over
> > > the
> > > > place!
> > > >
> > > > Two servers I manually sync'd with a domain controller less than
> 24
> > > hours
> > > > ago are now once again 3 minutes behind.
> > > >
> > > > Workstations are up to 5 minutes one way or the other.
> > > >
> > > > I know this keeps coming up here, but again, please...
> > > >
> > > > 1. With multiple domain controllers, does one pick one of them,
> > sync
> > > to an
> > > > outside time source, then somehow point the other DCs to this DC?
> >  If
> > > so,
> > > > then one puts in the name of the selected DC in the registry
> > settings
> > > for
> > > > time services?  OR, does one make sure all the DCs point to the
> > same
> > > > external NTP server?
> > > >
> > > > 2. Why do servers and workstations drift off, time-wise?  How to
> > stop
> > > this?
> > > > --
> > > > Richard D. McClary
> > > > Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group
> > > >
> > > > ASPCA®
> > > > 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36
> > > > Urbana, IL  61802
> > > >
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > P: 217-337-9761
> > > > C: 217-417-1182
> > > > F: 217-337-9761
> > > > www.aspca.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments
> > hereto,
> > > is
> > > > from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
> Animals®
> > > (ASPCA®)
> > > > and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and
> > may
> > > > contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If
> you
> > > are not
> > > > the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified
> that
> > > any
> > > > dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of
> this
> > > e-mail,
> > > > and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received
> > > > this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email
> > and
> > > > permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and
> any
> > > printout
> > > > thereof.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> > >
> > >
> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to