Agreed.
If you are running as Admin for your normal login, you aren���t paying attention. If you ARE running as admin, and fall for my scheme to get you to run my binary I sent you, then I own y����� regardless of Win, Unix, Mac OS, etc��� -sc From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 4:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS Most Windows security issues today have little to do with Windows "security model" Most vulnerabilities today are actually in applications, not the OS. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ________________________________ From: "John Aldrich" Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:58:01 -0400 To: NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]> Subject: RE: MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS From: Robert Cato [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 3:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS Changing the name/logos isin't a valid engineering process?!? On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Sam Cayze <[email protected]> wrote: OneCare is already defunct? Just another reason I don't trust MS's consumer grade security products. I can't keep up with them. Defender>OneCare> and now Security Essentials? Defender and OneCare both would bring a machine to a halt, how am I going to trust the next version? -----Original Message----- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 1:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS Good read Stu. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stu Sjouwerman" <[email protected]> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:49 PM Subject: RE: MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS Here is some more from PCMag.com's Neil Rubenking Microsoft Security Essentials beta REVIEW DATE: 06.18.09 BOTTOM LINE: Microsoft Security Essentials is the promised successor to the defunct Windows Live OneCare. Focused solely on anti-malware functions, it has average performance, as OneCare did. But that may improve during the beta-and the software is free. PROS: Generally decent at removing and blocking malware. Small download. Simple user interface. Free for personal use. CONS: Less effective against rootkits and scareware. Requires surprisingly large amount of disk space. Forces Windows Update into full automatic mode. RATING: 3.5 out of 5. Also, I added MSE compared to VIPRE over here: http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/documents/vipre_vs_mse.pdf Warm regards, Stu Sjouwerman Founder, VP Marketing. P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218 F: +1-727-562-5199 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Rod Trent [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 5:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS Very nice. It's quiet, unobtrusive. Performance is excellent. -----Original Message----- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 5:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS Anyone using the new Microsoft Security Essentials? What are your observations? Murray ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ .. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
