On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:50, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Free, Bob <[email protected]> wrote: >> Still won't help. TS Licensing still has no notion of concurrency. > > To amplify what Bob is saying: > > Every client using your server must have a CAL. CALs are *not* > assigned to servers, they're assigned to clients. > > The client that gets the CAL assigned to it can be a warm body > ("user") or a piece of equipment ("device"). But one of those two > must have a CAL assigned it. > > If you have one Terminal Server, with 100 users (each with their own > PC), you need 100 CALs. Even if you only have *one* person logging on > at a time, you still need 100 CALs. > > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/licensing-terminal.aspx > > -- Ben
Lovely. I knew there was a reason why we haven't switched away from our Win2k TS server to something newer. With that, as long as you have XP or newer, no separate TS license needed. Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
