Yeah. but the point is I'm trying to take the storage roll *off* the
existing two servers and put the storage on a dedicated storage appliance.
Hooking an external raid array to the existing servers wouldn't do me much
good in that respect. J

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 10:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Starwind 5.0

 

You can run the controller software on existing servers, depending on their
function and load.

And there are multiple ways to connect to the storage you need, including
SCSI and FC and iSCSI

ASB (My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker> 
Providing Competitive Advantage through Effective IT Leadership 

 

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:37 AM, John Aldrich <[email protected]>
wrote:

Exactly. To have redundancy, I'd have to build/buy two more servers to
attach to what are essentially external raid arrays, correct?

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:33 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Starwind 5.0

 

One server can manage multiple SANs. You should consider redundancy, though.


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

  _____  

From: "John Aldrich" <[email protected]> 

Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:25:43 -0400

To: NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]>

Subject: RE: Starwind 5.0

 

Ah. Never mind then. J I don't want to build two new servers to have two
SANs. I want it all built together. J

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Starwind 5.0

 

Essentially, yes.   You build a server with gobs of storage attached, and
then run this software on it to present it to your infrastructure as an
iSCSI storage network.

ASB (My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker> 
Providing Competitive Advantage through Effective IT Leadership 

 

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:32 AM, John Aldrich <[email protected]>
wrote:

Thanks for that link. I filled out a request for more info. That being said,
it looks like it's trying to use your server as the "brains" for the SAN, is
that right?

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:07 PM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Starwind 5.0

 

For those looking for small/medium sized SANS w/o the expense. The latest
SW5 has HA now .. Ive got their older version running in my datacenter and
its been decent no real complaints on performance for the price.

 

http://www.starwindsoftware.com/starwind-v5-preview

 

 

 

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2440 - Release Date: 10/16/09
06:32:00


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to