Hi all, the only reason I am replying to my own is because of the time
difference between the UK and various parts of the US - now that America is
online I thought I would repost in case the shift deleters amongst you
missed this earlier :-)

2009/10/23 Clayton Doige <[email protected]>

> it's possible, but I have a client who has a bunch of ML form factor
> machines he wants converted to rack - so he has some ML 3** boxes, and I
> thought DTM would be a good way to get him where he needs to go - P2V would
> be cool, but I am not sure if that is an option given that the existing DL's
> would not support multipe OS's given their resources.
>
>  2009/10/23 Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]>
>
>> Considering migration to VMs?
>>
>>  *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker>
>> *Providing Competitive Advantage through Effective IT Leadership*
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Clayton Doige 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all, I am considering using Double Take Move to migrate some servers
>>> off of old hardware, and on to newer faster boxes. before I commit i was
>>> hoping some of you could tell me what you have used to achieve this in the
>>> past
>>>
>>> The advanatages I see with the Double Take product are:
>>>
>>>    - cost (£207 GBP RRP)
>>>    - hardware agnostic - replicates data, system state, applications on
>>>    to an exisiting OS that already has the required drivers
>>>    - no downtime for migration of data
>>>    - 5 minute cut over
>>>    - no data loss (snapshots can leave new data behind)
>>>
>>> So I would be really interested in hearing if you have experienced any
>>> other products that compare to these features :-)
>>>
>>> many thanks
>>>
>>> Clayton
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Clayton
> [email protected]
> http://alsipius.com
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Clayton
[email protected]
http://alsipius.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to