I'm not sure if the Duo supports AD. The TeraStation LIVE doesn't. The TeraStation Pro does. But even the Pro doesn't support security below the share level. (at least not in the II version. Haven't seen the III yet.)
Ben M. Schorr Chief Executive Officer ______________________________________________ Roland Schorr & Tower www.rolandschorr.com <http://www.rolandschorr.com/> [email protected] From: Walker, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Buffalo TeraStation III I bought a Buffalo TeraStation DUO 1 TB to play with. It was pretty cheap looking with Samsung Hard Drives. I have not called their tech support yet but have spent several hours unsuccessfully trying to get the NAS to integrate with AD. ________________________________ From: Roger Wright [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 1:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Buffalo TeraStation III I seem to recall some type of integration with AD for file/folder level permissions. Roger Wright ___ Sent from Tampa, FL, United States On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ben Schorr <[email protected]> wrote: I haven't looked at the III but the biggest problem we saw with the earlier versions was that there was NO provision for file or folder-level security. You could ONLY apply security at the SHARE level. Which rendered the unit mostly useless for our business clients. I hope they've fixed that because otherwise I really like their devices. Ben M. Schorr Chief Executive Officer ______________________________________________ Roland Schorr & Tower www.rolandschorr.com [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Devin Meade [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:06 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Buffalo TeraStation III > > We are considering this for a NAS device. I see some rave reviews here on > this newsgroup and on Amazon. I also see some horrific tech support stories > on Amazon reviews. But can you really trust Amazon reviews? I also see a > range of bad / good reviews on cnet.com (most from prior to 2008, but one > from 4 mos ago). The majority of the negative reviews are for replacement > hard drives, that ought to be easy-peasy-lemon-squeazy to fix. Hmmkay. > Anyway I see that they have new firmware which fixes a multitude of > problems. I see good reviews for the most part for the last year or so - > maybe they have their ducks lined up now. > > Has anyone used one of these AND had a disk failure that was resolved like it > should be? > > http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-reviews/30790-the-terastation- > reborn-buffalo-terastation-iii-reviewed > I see they are using SATA 3. That was too hard to find out. > > http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/index.php?option=com_nas&Itemid=&ch > art=12 > Shows 55MB / sec write performance - on a 2 drive setup. No RAID5 > numbers??? > > Does anyone have a RAID5 setup and have write performance numbers? We > are considering the 4 drive array using 2TB drives (giving us 6TB usable). > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
