NONDISCLOSURE indicates a clandestine effort, and is the critical word in my
post ... There may well be a business case for it, but if anyone wants to
put packet capture software on my network for a business use, they damn well
better tell me about it before hand.

It's not just the WHAT Ben, it's the HOW and the WHY that bother me about
this.

I use network sniffers/packet captures on a regular basis to troubleshoot.
But I NEVER put one in place without letting the owner know.




Erik Goldoff
IT  Consultant
Systems, Networks, & Security 


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Dell vendor rant!

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Another thing I did notice is that it has wireshark and winpcap
installed."
>
> From a security standpoint, nondisclosure of that software being 
> preinstalled by the vendor is an extreme violation of trust and tantamount
...

  You're accepting a computer with software pre-installed by someone else,
most of which you cannot view the code to, and you're okay with that.  But
they load a sniffer and you're calling the FBI?

  As a guy who frequently has to wear a "network admin" hat, I wouldn't want
to try and diagnose a network trouble without a sniffer, any more than I
would want to not be able to use ping or traceroute.

  FYI, a network sniffer (tcpdump) is a standard tool with many *nix
systems.

  But then again, there are people who call abuse desks when someone pings
them.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to