Well wasn't _THAT_ a convenient time for the drive to fail!
-sc From: tony patton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? I *thought* i needed the whole tera to copy everything from my 2x500gig stripe in my main PC, but 1 of the hard drives failed halfway through and lost what i hadn't copied and wanted to use it to store vms as well. have about 500gig free on the new vm store, will probably create an extra volume in OF and transfer stuff into it then remove the terabyte volume. Just couldn't be ar$ed at the moment. Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: [email protected] From: "Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]> Date: 20/11/2009 15:06 Subject: RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? ________________________________ You mean shrink once it's been carved out? Did you carve then that large to begin with for a reason? -sc From: tony patton [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? I have openfiler as a VM in ESXi with an NFS connection back to it from the host. Far from ideal, but at the time the server only had a 1tb and 160gig satas, since changed the 160 for another tera. The big niggle I have with openfiler is that you can't shrink the disks, it has the whole terabyte. Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Jonathan Link <[email protected]> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]> Date: 20/11/2009 14:54 Subject: Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? ________________________________ That is good to know, I'll keep it in mind as I begin developing my home environment... On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: So far I have them that way, simply because in testing that was the easiest, and I don't have a Virtual Center setup that allows for vMotion anyway L. However, I opted for OpenFiler over the easier-to-setup FreeNAS because recent reports suggest that vMotion on OpenFiler is now supported, hence I assume the reservation issue may be resolved. Thanks Jonathan. -sc From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? I would suggest that the VM's accessed by each host be on separate LUN's. OpenFiler, as of the this past may did not support SCSI-3 reservations which can wreak some havoc with multiple ESXi hosts accessing one lun. I used it in production, successfully for over a year due to a necessity of inheriting an ill-conceived budget from my predecessor and enduring a probationary period of proving myself and my methodology to the firm. The situation I Was using it in was one VM host with three guests all of which were not at the time considered mission critical. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: Doing some testing with OpenFiler for iSCSI SAN testing. I'm presenting LUN's via GigE links to my ESXi boxen hosting Win2K3 and Win2K8 VM's. So far I'm pretty impressed... and the price is right for a home network. Anybody played with it and/or have any pointers to best practices or performances considerations? One of the things I'm wondering about particularly is if there's any advantages to using the Windows iSCSI initiator as opposed to letting ESXi own the LUNs and present the storage as local volumes to the Win boxen. Thanks. -sc ==================================================================== http://www.quinn-insurance.com <http://www.quinn-insurance.com/> This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. The contents should not be copied nor disclosed to any other person. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of QUINN-Insurance, unless otherwise specifically stated . As internet communications are not secure, QUINN-Insurance is not responsible for the contents of this message nor responsible for any change made to this message after it was sent by the original sender. Although virus scanning is used on all inbound and outbound e-mail, we advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of any software viruses. ==================================================================== QUINN-Life Direct Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator. QUINN-Insurance Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK business. ==================================================================== QUINN-Life Direct Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number 292374 and is a private company limited by shares. QUINN-Insurance Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number 240768 and is a private company limited by shares. Both companies have their head office at Dublin Road, Cavan, Co. Cavan. ==================================================================== http://www.quinn-insurance.com This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. The contents should not be copied nor disclosed to any other person. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of QUINN-Insurance, unless otherwise specifically stated . As internet communications are not secure, QUINN-Insurance is not responsible for the contents of this message nor responsible for any change made to this message after it was sent by the original sender. Although virus scanning is used on all inbound and outbound e-mail, we advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of any software viruses. ==================================================================== QUINN-Life Direct Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator. QUINN-Insurance Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK business. ==================================================================== QUINN-Life Direct Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number 292374 and is a private company limited by shares. QUINN-Insurance Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number 240768 and is a private company limited by shares. Both companies have their head office at Dublin Road, Cavan, Co. Cavan. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
