Based on past comments I have had with end users if they like Live Messenger (actually it could be any messenger client) you will have an up hill fight getting them to switch. At least OCS could use their preferred client.
Good Luck, Jon On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Roger Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you deploy some type of web-based video conferencing system rather > than using MS Live? > > > Roger Wright > ___ > > Sent from Tampa, FL, United States > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Our new CEO want her direct reports to use Live Messenger accounts for >> IM/chat, and a couple of them (out of the country) to have web cam >> conferencing. >> >> This, of course, means poking holes in the firewall and installing the >> client, both of which I'm not happy about. Does anyone have some >> arguments as to why this isn't a good idea? >> >> Along with that, does anyone have thoughts on something I could >> install (probably in a DMZ) to provide this service? >> >> Open Source is definitely not out of the question, as far as I'm >> concerned, but commercial is fine too. >> >> Kurt >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
