The only way I know of to proxy Live Messenger is with ISA, and I don't have that in my environment.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 07:15, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > What do you mean you can't proxy Live Messenger? A word of warning as I am > sure you know there are even older tech articles on the MS web site that > would have you open even more ports. > > Jon > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hey, it was nearly the first hit. >> >> I actually have only had to open one port beyond 80 and 443, though I >> can't remember which it was off the top of my head, but that's one >> port too many, since I can't proxy it. >> >> Kurt >> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 04:25, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > That is SO not current. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:55 AM >> > To: NT System Admin Issues >> > Subject: Re: A new challenge for me... >> > >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927847 - yuck... >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 19:51, Brian Desmond <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> I'd +1 all the recommendations for OCS. It really is a fantastic >> >> product (having been a user of it). >> >> >> >> That said I'm not sure why you need to make firewall changes for MSN >> >> Messenger audio/video? I've used this before through various firewalls. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brian Desmond >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> c – 312.731.3132 >> >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:58 PM >> >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >>> Subject: A new challenge for me... >> >>> >> >>> Our new CEO want her direct reports to use Live Messenger accounts >> >>> for IM/chat, and a couple of them (out of the country) to have web >> >>> cam conferencing. >> >>> >> >>> This, of course, means poking holes in the firewall and installing >> >>> the client, both of which I'm not happy about. Does anyone have some >> >>> arguments as to why this isn't a good idea? >> >>> >> >>> Along with that, does anyone have thoughts on something I could >> >>> install (probably in a DMZ) to provide this service? >> >>> >> >>> Open Source is definitely not out of the question, as far as I'm >> >>> concerned, but commercial is fine too. >> >>> >> >>> Kurt >> >>> >> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ >> >>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ >> >> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ >> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > >> > >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
