+1 for Trend. I almost hate to say it, but after upgrading McAfee from 4.0 to 4.5 it's not too bad either (the console is better), but maybe it's because I have so much damn time into it at this point. I use it's rogue detection and I like it.
Trend has a much better learning curve and I certainly recommend it. No performance issues and the client that has it always has 4-5yr old machines with it (50 machines, replace 10/yr = always 10 machines 4+ years old). David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 7:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Vipre Competition Trend On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Damien Solodow <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think the general consensus is Symantec. ;) -----Original Message----- From: Steve Kelsay [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Vipre Competition OK. If for some reason, we cannot use Vipre (which is my choice at this point), what is the second best choice of AV/Anti Malware attacks? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
