Nice. I guess I always intuited that this was easily accomplished, but never really thought about it in a practical sense.
“Can you hear me now?” (Maybe it should be, “Can you hear me then?”) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 10:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: VoIP Great acronym! Note, though, that Wireshark now comes equipped with tools to find VoIP traffic within packets and then play them. In fact, we grab packets by routine for trouble-shooting. We have also had a few events where a call which should have been recorded somehow was not recorded. I was able to retrieve the conversation from these packets. Philip Brothwell <[email protected]> wrote on 12/31/2009 09:02:05 AM: > Like the joys of dealing with people running vomit? http://vomit.xtdnet.nl/ > > > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Wilhelm, Scott <[email protected] > > wrote: > Also, think about the added switch if you’re using phones like Cisco > where you connect the phone to the wall & then the computer to the > phone. What are the added possibilities there? > > > > From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:36 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: VoIP > > Would it be accurate to state that going to VoIP you are now adding > phone calls to the same security concerns as data over IP and you’re > effectively adding nodes? Say, 300 VoIP devices now means your > switches, routers and firewalls need to be configured and operated > as if you have 300 new data systems (servers ,PC’s) on your wire, > but now with a different OS pushing data over the wire? Sure, it > might be over different CAT5 and physical hardware, but conceptually > it’s the same, right? > David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION > (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
