What's wrong with Vipre Enterprise? J Seriously. I'm using it here on ~100
machines and it's doing pretty good. Had some growing pains learning how to
configure it, but it's very flexible and works well.

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Marty Nelson [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Moving away from Symantec, how 'bout Microsoft Forefront? Is there
a better database options?

 

Greetings and salutations everyone!  Let me apologize in advance for such a
long e-mail, I didn't intend for it to go on and on and on.x

 

Here's the deal.  Our Symantec agreement is up for renewal here in a little
bit and we are looking at possible alternatives.  One package that I am
particularly interested in is Microsoft's Forefront.  Normally I would
cringe at buying something like this from Microsoft, but after my experience
with Security Essentials (which has been GREAT BTW); I thought that looking
at their enterprise solution may not be a bad idea so I wanted to see what
everyone here thinks.   

 

The one thing I haven't yet figured out (as I'm not a great DB man) is that
they sell Forefront with MS SQL (locked down so it only works with
Forefront, at least that's how I read it) or without it.  Now the way they
phrase things indicates that MS SQL is needed in one way or another, and I
was wondering if that was really true.  Is it possible to use and open
source database?  Is anyone here running Forefront?  Is so, what's your
database solution? 

 

And if not MS's Forefront, then where else should I be looking?  I know a
while back EOD32 was a favorite, is that still the case?  We've been stuck
with Symantec for ~10 years now and with the bloat and stability of their
programs I would really like to get away from them if there's a viable
alternative out there.

 

Thanks so much,

 

-Marty Nelson

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to