I am not going to suggest what to buy but I will tell you YOU MUST HAVE A
FULL COPY OF SQL for ForeFront to work.  Make no mistakes about that.  I got
burned bad by that "little" fact.  I will let others make suggestions and I
will not say nay to any of them except to say yes get away from Symantec.

Jon

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marty Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Greetings and salutations everyone!  Let me apologize in advance for such
> a long e-mail, I didn’t intend for it to go on and on and on…x
>
> Here’s the deal.  Our Symantec agreement is up for renewal here in a little
> bit and we are looking at possible alternatives.  One package that I am
> particularly interested in is Microsoft’s Forefront.  Normally I would
> cringe at buying something like this from Microsoft, but after my experience
> with Security Essentials (which has been GREAT BTW); I thought that looking
> at their enterprise solution may not be a bad idea so I wanted to see what
> everyone here thinks.
>
> The one thing I haven’t yet figured out (as I’m not a great DB man) is that
> they sell Forefront with MS SQL (locked down so it only works with
> Forefront, at least that’s how I read it) or without it.  Now the way they
> phrase things indicates that MS SQL is needed in one way or another, and I
> was wondering if that was really true.  Is it possible to use and open
> source database?  Is anyone here running Forefront?  Is so, what’s your
> database solution?
>
> And if not MS’s Forefront, then where else should I be looking?  I know a
> while back EOD32 was a favorite, is that still the case?  We’ve been stuck
> with Symantec for ~10 years now and with the bloat and stability of their
> programs I would really like to get away from them if there’s a viable
> alternative out there.
>
> Thanks so much,
>
> -Marty Nelson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to