I've wondered - what is the overhead involved with that?

You didn't really cover that in AD 4e.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 7:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dc replication / logonserver

I would enable change notification on the site link given this scenario so you 
don't get the 15 minute replication delay. 

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[email protected]

c - 312.731.3132


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: dc replication / logonserver
> 
> No. if you separate the sites you should be fine.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 7:09 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: dc replication / logonserver
> 
> Thanks. After trying to dig up some old info, I had the sites and 
> services setup but I didn't have them in different sites. So I added 
> the different subnets and create different sites now and put a site 
> link between them. Im hoping this clears up which servers talk to which dc's.
> 
> Michael, do you think I will still need to run this? Sounds like I 
> will be good after a reboot now that the sites have been updated. 
> That's good info to have though we are preparing the DR site for a 
> test in the next month or so, and will want to remember to failback 
> all the servers talking to which DC's post rollback I would think :)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 6:42 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: dc replication / logonserver
> 
> Nltest /sc_reset:<domain>\<desired-dc>
> 
> Note that a domain member, once connected to a particular DC, will 
> continue to talk to that DC unless the site is changed or the secure 
> channel reset or the DC isn't available.
> 
> Netdom can do this too.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> 
> From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 6:30 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: dc replication / logonserver
> 
> I have a site @ 600 users, with dual 100mb links between the primary 
> and secondary site (a datacenter). We have a sensitive network 
> application being deployed and find people getting kicked out of it 
> because the server cannot authenticate them fast enough (1ms is the 
> limit, don't ask why). So on some of the servers I keep finding their 
> 'logonserver' being listed as the 3rd DC in the datacenter. In AD 
> Sites/Services there is full replication between all 3, and while the 
> link is a full fiber 100mb connection, I wanted to keep that locally.
> 
> I wouldn't normally think anything of it, but the application 
> developers are pointing this out as the potential problem so I have to 
> make it so all computers and servers in the primary network do not 
> talk to the DC in the datacenter. In DNS no one is pointing to the 
> remote site, so I guess the remote server is just responding faster 
> than the local dc's. WINS/DHCP/DNS all have replication to this DC as well.
> 
> Isnt there a simple way to do that? I know ive read up on wan links 
> etc and I can force a particular domain controller in the registry but 
> that's not going to be a fun permanent solution I don't think.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to