Have you looked at or considered using 2008 AD/NAS/NAC for this?

Jon

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Chyka, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Well we have Cisco WAPs, controllers, and radius servers.  We have full
> authentication built into Active Directory.  We are missing the whole NAC
> piece though like the checks for Antivirus, scanning, patching etc before
> you autehnticate.
>
> Thanks.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:31 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Wireless NAC
>
>    There are controls built into a lot of the 3rd-party firmware for
> wireless access points to allow you to have a “hotspot” mode. I’m sure that
> could be modified to require authentication against the network, etc.
>
>
>
> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools]
>
>
>
> *From:* Chyka, Robert [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:41 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Wireless NAC
>
>
>
> We currently have a homegrown system for our dorm students on campus for
> our wired network.  It resembles Cisco clean access, but it is agent-less.
> It basically puts all ports on an isolated subnet that can only get to our
> "ResNet" clean access system
>
>
>
> Our system makes sure that they remove their current and install our
> Corporate managed Antivirus Product, it makes them run Microsoft Update to
> patch their system, run a qucik spyware scan with an embedded scanner on the
> webpage, then it makes them authenticate against our user database serverss
> and then it "flips" their network port over to the non isolated network
> segment (vlan).
>
>
>
> We do not have wireless in the dorms, and we need to get it there soon.
> The reason why we don't have wireless in the dorms is so they don't bypass
> our "clean access" system when they bring their machines from home filled
> with junk.
>
>
>
> Does anyone know a good package to look at for wireless nac?  Agentless
> would be best,  We evaluated Clean Access 2 years ago and it really wasn't
> worth the money.  Had alot of issues and maybe just wasn't mature then?
>
>
>
> Thanks for any suggestions.
>
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image002.jpg>>

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to