There are debates about privacy out there, but I also have found the free
version to be very useful.  I don't have any definite proof, but at least I
get the feeling that having them filter out many known malicious sites is a
nice addition to the overall defense in depth strategy we've taken with
regard to malware.

The ability to administratively block particular domains without modifying
your internal DNS is also a nice plus.


On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:24 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I use the free version and have found zero downsides. Environments of 3,
> 7, 17, and 55 systems.
>
>
>
> *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER
> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
> (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Cameron Cooper [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:02 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OpenDNS
> *Sensitivity:* Confidential
>
>
>
> What are some of the benefits, security issues, complaints about using
> OpenDNS?
>
>
>
> _____________________________
>
> *Cameron Cooper*
>
> *System Administrator | CompTIA A+ Certified*
>
> Aurico Reports, Inc
>
> Phone: 847-890-4021 | Fax: 847-255-1896
>
> [email protected] | www.aurico.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to