Just in case you're interested, there's also this: http://openvswitch.org/
It seems to be getting a lot of play in the Xen world, especially XCP. On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:18, Richard Stovall <[email protected]> wrote: > The way I do this is by having a dedicated router VM as well. It is dual > homed - one NIC bound to the hardware and therefore on the 'real' LAN (the > 'public' NIC), and the other on a VM-only network (the 'private' NIC). I > have my test VMs route out through the router VM which isn't part of the > test domain. It truly acts as a router / firewall. > I have often used Server 2003's RRAS for this, but I recently switched to > Vyatta VC5 (http://www.vyatta.org/downloads) so that I can have multiple LAN > ip addresses bound to the router's public NIC and forward the same port on > different ip addresses to different machines on the test network. > (Currently playing with Exchange 2003 to 2010 migration scenarios where I > keep the 2003 server alive for a period of time.) > HTH, > RS > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Glen Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hoping someone can point me to a workaround for this. >> >> We have a lab of 8 vista boxes running VPC 2007 sp1. >> >> The teacher is teaching server 2008 and wants to have each student set up >> a domain controller and client workstation. >> >> We set up the server and client as guests, configuring each to use Shared >> NAT networking. >> >> Problem is the two guests can’t talk to each other. >> >> I see in the help that this is expected, but I’m wondering if anyone knows >> how to allow the guests to talk to each other, other than using Private” >> networking. With private, they don’t have access to the internet, which >> they also need. >> >> Thanks and happy Friday to all. >> >> >> >> > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
