I had it up and running in a couple of hours with my first VM running in
less than 30 minutes after that.  The VM speed was due to my having a couple
of VM's built in Virtual Server I could use.  That was without a lot of
documentation of Hyper-V.  This was in late June early July 2008.  There is
a lot more documentation available now but Hyper-V is very easy and just
doing the reading and playing a bit will teach you what you need.  The SCVMM
would in my opinion need/desire training as would SCCM and SCOM.

I would not recommend taking a Virtual Server machine and just using it in
Hyper-V even though you can.  I liked the ease of building machines in
Hyper-V and just keeping a couple of "base" machines in storage so I could
do fast builds.

Jon

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Stephen Wimberly <[email protected]>wrote:

> You bring good points and I should have mentioned that due to our
> Microsoft Licensing agreement the cost difference between Hyper-V and
> VMWare makes Hyper-V a 'no brainer'.  To that end we already use SCCM
> and have a license for SCVMM but have not deployed it yet.  (It was
> part of the System Center package we bought.)
>
> SO: no training on Hyper-V?  Of course we are looking into SCVMM
> training as well.
>
> Instead of instructor lead training like New Horizons I prefer CBT
> based training which is often more thorough and even "replayable".
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Depending on which VM manager product you are going with will decide if
> you
> > really need training or not.  The Microsoft Hyper-V product by itself
> needs
> > little training but the VMWare will cost you more in time and training.
> If
> > you are going with some of the Microsoft add on stuff like SCCM/SCVMM
> etc.
> > then you would be best to get training on their product as well.
> MyITForum
> > would be a good place to start for the System Center line of product and
> > asking about training.  I would think that VMWare has forums that could
> > direct you to semi-local training on their product.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Stephen Wimberly <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
>  >> What training would you consider 'recommended' for a server admin
> >> going into virtual servers for the first time?  We have used Microsoft
> >> Virtual Server 2005 before, but did not care for the setup.  We are
> >> currently looking at a recommendation from Dell which covers two
> >> server host boxes, one storage box and one management switch.  I
> >> currently manage about 20 physical servers, so what I would need would
> >> be specific to the differences to virtual servers rather than physical
> >> servers.  All I need to do is add a line item for "training costs" and
> >> go for funding options!  How much do you think training for virtual
> >> environments could be worth?
> >>
> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to