I'm assuming that this machine is not a laptop?  Laptops would be the
exception, other than that, I absolutely agree that a workstation should
never have a public ip address assigned.

What kind of compliance are you under.  At the very least I would think PCI
and probably more.  You have a pretty good case of a user not following best
practices and depending on your organization, not following stated
rules/guidelines.  Certainly at least a warning to this guy is warranted,
and possibly disciplinary action as well.

Looks like you're going to have some fun eh?

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:39 AM, David Mazzaccaro <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Well, that makes me feel a little better.
> However...now to the problem of this guy not using a firewall/router.
> Would you agree that a machine should NEVER have a public address assigned?
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 12, 2010 10:36 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Vipre - how is this possible?
>
> I don't think that it was routed on your network, just reported by Vipre.
> Probably what happened was that Vipre saw the agent on there, and reported
> it before the machine got a DHCP address.  Vipre acts pretty fast on
> machines booting up on the network in my observation.  We have non laptop
> machines that connect via VPN have Vipre Home Edition on them, so they never
> actually show up in my Vipre console.  If it's a laptop, it has Vipre
> Enterprise on it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:28 AM, David Mazzaccaro <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Not a DMZ address... my VPN addresses are all 172.16.x.x and always show
>> up in Vipre w/ those addresses.
>>
>> I wonder if this guy connected directly to some outside internet
>> connection (no firewall, router) and got a public IP (which this is), then
>> brought his laptop in to the office and somehow vipre used that IP?  I have
>> no idea how it could have gotten routed on my internet work though?!?!
>> Or maybe it didn't get routed, just reported???
>>
>> My biggest worry is that somehow it DID connect to the Vipre server...
>> that would be bad.
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 12, 2010 10:18 AM
>>
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: Vipre - how is this possible?
>>
>>  At some point it was on your wire and got assimilated by Vipre.  Because
>> it's status is inactive it's not being managed by Vipre.  I see this all the
>> time especially with laptops.
>>
>> Is this a DMZ ip address?  Does this machine have multiple nics with
>> different ip addresses?
>>
>>  On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:59 AM, David Mazzaccaro <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am very confused/concerned as to how a computer w/ an external IP
>>> address got listed in my Vipre v3 console...
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> [image: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)]
>>>
>>> I do not have "update from the internet" checked for the policy that this
>>> computer belongs to, nor do I have Vipre ports open on my firewall:
>>>
>>> [image: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sherry Abercrombie
>>
>> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to