Would that not depend on the load, how old the hardware is, and what you intend to do at the time? I know that the last place I worked we skipped the 2003 R2 step and went with 2008 but that machine was a VM as I did not want to keep a lot of hardware around. Space for them was at a premium both in the racks and on the floor. The only reason for the last DC to remain physical was that it was the PDCe and there were several trusts involved that were very difficult to setup and keep running due to the way the networking was done. If things were different there would have been no phyical DC's all would have been VM's running on two differnet boxes.
Jon On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:22 PM, John Aldrich <[email protected]>wrote: > I’m not in a position to do it now, but I’m trying to think ahead a year > or two and wondering how hard it’s going to be to upgrade our DCs when we > want to go from 2003R2 to the newest and best thing. Assuming I wanted to > upgrade today, would it be better to start from scratch on new hardware and > just add the 2008 machine to the mix of the AD and then upgrade the schema > or what? > > > > Also, I was talking to a potential SAN vendor this morning and they > mentioned virtualizing machines. I would think one would not want to > virtualize all of their domain controllers, would you? Would it be safe to > virtualize one DC and have one physical DC? > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
