Simple. You pull a Sandra Bullock and type in 10.65.537.x and it magically works.
Webster > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] > Subject: Re: Strange network issue > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like to use IP addressing related to that physical address ... > > Back when I was doing the IT consultant thing, we tended to use > 10.0.0.0/24 for everything, simply because it's easy to read-off over > the phone when you're trying to walk a user through fixing something > to avoid a 1-hour drive. > > > For example, for a network located at 955 > > West XXXXth, I would use 10.9.55.x for the LAN. > > What happens if you have someone at 65537 West XXXXth? ;-) ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
